NGO responses vary. Oxfam's Duncan Green is “unusually optimistic” but Friends of the Earth are not. The ‘Put People First’ coalition reflects that mix of views.
Personally, I homed in on paragraphs 21 and 27 of the G20 communiqué.
First, Paragraph 27. It reads “We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery. We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.”.
While short on specifics, this sets a collective goal against which the G20 can be judged when it meets again later in the year. It gives a good basis for investors to engage further with governments and development banks in the coming weeks.
Paragraph 21 is more intriguing. It says “..we agreed on the desirability of a new global consensus on the key values and principles that will promote sustainable economic activity. We support discussion on such a charter for sustainable economic activity with a view to further discussion at our next meeting. We take note of the work started in other fora in this regard and look forward to further discussion of this charter for sustainable economic activity.”
Could this be the start of a genuine debate?
Is it the first step of a global transition from GDP towards new measures of prosperity? And towards the new approach to incentives, rules and policies that would follow this shift?
So, overall, I would say – “the jury’s still out”. The direction of travel is positive, but there is still much to do. Policy makers need to deliver not just an effective global banking system but also a major economic transition, including sustainable capital markets for long-term responsible investment. The G20 has only started the process of delivering a sustainable recovery and, by their next summit later in the year, further major milestones need to have been reached.
Personally, I homed in on paragraphs 21 and 27 of the G20 communiqué.
First, Paragraph 27. It reads “We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery. We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.”.
While short on specifics, this sets a collective goal against which the G20 can be judged when it meets again later in the year. It gives a good basis for investors to engage further with governments and development banks in the coming weeks.
Paragraph 21 is more intriguing. It says “..we agreed on the desirability of a new global consensus on the key values and principles that will promote sustainable economic activity. We support discussion on such a charter for sustainable economic activity with a view to further discussion at our next meeting. We take note of the work started in other fora in this regard and look forward to further discussion of this charter for sustainable economic activity.”
Could this be the start of a genuine debate?
Is it the first step of a global transition from GDP towards new measures of prosperity? And towards the new approach to incentives, rules and policies that would follow this shift?
So, overall, I would say – “the jury’s still out”. The direction of travel is positive, but there is still much to do. Policy makers need to deliver not just an effective global banking system but also a major economic transition, including sustainable capital markets for long-term responsible investment. The G20 has only started the process of delivering a sustainable recovery and, by their next summit later in the year, further major milestones need to have been reached.
No comments:
Post a Comment