I am more and more convinced that apparently robust interventions like improved regulation will deliver effective ownership and sustainable capital markets only if there is associated cultural change. This is not an argument against regulation – but it is an argument against regulation alone.
It is good to see a range of proposals now coming forward on responsible ownership and capital market reform – but one test is how they will change cultures and norms so that new behaviours are “what we believe in doing around here” rather than “what our compliance department says we have to be seen to do”.
Anita Skipper, Corporate Governance Director at Aviva Investors and Alan MacDougall and his colleagues at PIRC have both just published thoughtful contributions to the debate.
Introducing PIRC’s “Manifesto for corporate governance and capital market reform”, Alan says “Too many institutions fail to take their ownership responsibilities seriously, therefore post-crisis reform must consider their role too. There can be no return to business as usual.” The manifesto aims to “stimulate debate and spark further ideas, but most importantly to begin the process of pulling together ... radical but realistic policy reforms”. PIRC is seeking comments on its suggestions.
Anita’s piece “Corporate governance and the economic crisis: what can shareholders do differently?” appears in Aviva Investors’ The Investors Journal (Volume 3). (NB. To get access, just click either “I am a private investor” or a more appropriate category.)
She highlights barriers to good governance including “Lack of client interest”, “Human behaviour” and “Managing conflicts of interest”. Her solutions include “More client focus on governance” and “Focus on culture”.
Importantly, she says “With the right corporate culture in place, companies, boards and fund managers are more likely to make the “right” decisions, irrespective of any weaknesses of accountability, regulation, accounting standards and conflicts of interest.”
It is good to see a range of proposals now coming forward on responsible ownership and capital market reform – but one test is how they will change cultures and norms so that new behaviours are “what we believe in doing around here” rather than “what our compliance department says we have to be seen to do”.
Anita Skipper, Corporate Governance Director at Aviva Investors and Alan MacDougall and his colleagues at PIRC have both just published thoughtful contributions to the debate.
Introducing PIRC’s “Manifesto for corporate governance and capital market reform”, Alan says “Too many institutions fail to take their ownership responsibilities seriously, therefore post-crisis reform must consider their role too. There can be no return to business as usual.” The manifesto aims to “stimulate debate and spark further ideas, but most importantly to begin the process of pulling together ... radical but realistic policy reforms”. PIRC is seeking comments on its suggestions.
Anita’s piece “Corporate governance and the economic crisis: what can shareholders do differently?” appears in Aviva Investors’ The Investors Journal (Volume 3). (NB. To get access, just click either “I am a private investor” or a more appropriate category.)
She highlights barriers to good governance including “Lack of client interest”, “Human behaviour” and “Managing conflicts of interest”. Her solutions include “More client focus on governance” and “Focus on culture”.
Importantly, she says “With the right corporate culture in place, companies, boards and fund managers are more likely to make the “right” decisions, irrespective of any weaknesses of accountability, regulation, accounting standards and conflicts of interest.”
No comments:
Post a Comment